টেমপ্লেট:GAList2

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality: [[চিত্র:|16px|alt=|link=]]

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: [[চিত্র:|16px|alt=|link=]]

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section: [[চিত্র:|16px|alt=|link=]]

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: [[চিত্র:|16px|alt=|link=]]

   C. No original research: [[চিত্র:|16px|alt=|link=]]

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects: [[চিত্র:|16px|alt=|link=]]

   B. Focused: [[চিত্র:|16px|alt=|link=]]

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias: [[চিত্র:|16px|alt=|link=]]

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc: [[চিত্র:|16px|alt=|link=]]

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: [[চিত্র:|16px|alt=|link=]]

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: [[চিত্র:|16px|alt=|link=]]

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: [[চিত্র:|16px|alt=|link=]]

টেমপ্লেট নথি[দেখুন] [সম্পাদনা] [ইতিহাস] [শোধন]

Usage

{{subst:GAList2
|overcom=
|1a=
|1acom=
|1b=
|1bcom=
|2a=
|2acom=
|2b=
|2bcom=
|2c=
|2ccom=
|3a=
|3acom=
|3b=
|3bcom=
|4=
|4com=
|5=
|5com=
|6a=
|6acom=
|6b=
|6bcom=
|7=
|7com=
}}

Available arguments are y, n, aye, nay, wtf, and ???; some synonyms are also available for these arguments. Any other argument or no argument at all gives an undecided mark.

The comment lines ("com") are used for additional notes. If no comment is included, the comment line doesn't appear. This is also true of "overcom", which allows for general comments before the subsections.

Note that the template should be substituted, as the GA guidelines are reviewed from time to time and this template may be changed.

Example

{{subst:GAList2
|overcom=This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
|1a=y
|1acom=Well done.
|1b=y
|2a=y
|2b=y
|2c=???
|2ccom=Some of the information in the third section appears to be OR.
|3a=y
|3b=y
|4=y
|5=
|6a=n
|6b=y
|7=n
|7com=Good luck with improving this article!
}}

results in:

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Well done.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

   Some of the information in the third section appears to be OR.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Good luck with improving this article!

Note: This template is a modification of {{GAList}}. Thanks to AzaToth and others for making the original.

See also

• {{GAList/check}}