উইকিপিডিয়া:উইকিপ্রকল্প হিন্দু/মূল্যায়ন
উইকিপিডিয়া:উইকিপ্রকল্প হিন্দু নিবন্ধগুলির মূল্যায়ন ও ব্যবহার পদ্ধতি
নির্দেশবলী সম্পাদনা
An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject Hinduism}} project banner on its talk page (see the project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax):
- {{WikiProject Hinduism| ... | class=??? | importance=??? | ...}}
The following values may be used for the class parameter:
- FA (adds articles to Category:FA-Class Hinduism articles)
- A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Hinduism articles)
- GA (adds articles to Category:GA-Class Hinduism articles)
- B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Hinduism articles)
- C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Hinduism articles)
- Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Hinduism articles)
- Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Hinduism articles)
- NA (for pages, such as templates or disambiguation pages, where assessment is unnecessary
Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Hinduism articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.
The following values may be used for the importance parameter:
- Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Hinduism articles)
- High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Hinduism articles)
- Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Hinduism articles)
- Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Hinduism articles)
The parameter is not used if an article's class is set to NA, and may be omitted in those cases. The importance should be assigned according to the importance scale below.
Quality scale সম্পাদনা
লেবেল | বিচারধারা | পাঠকের অভিজ্ঞতা | সম্পাদকের অভিজ্ঞতা | উদাহরণ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
নির্বাচিত {{FA-Class}} |
নির্বাচিত নিবন্ধের বর্তমান বিচারধারা অনুসারে যে নিবন্ধ পর্যালোচনার পরে নির্বাচিত নিবন্ধ হিসাবে সংরক্ষিত হয়েছে।। | চুড়ান্ত। সঠিক, আদ্যন্ত নিবন্ধটি বিশ্বকোষীয় তথ্যের জন্য একটি প্রামান্য উৎস। | নতুন তথ্য প্রকাশ না হওয়া অবধি আর কোনো সম্পাদনার প্রয়োজন নেই,কিন্তু লেখাতে আরও উন্নতিসাধন এখন সম্ভব । | বাংলাদেশ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
প্রনি {{A-Class}} |
Provides a well-written, reasonably clear and complete description of the topic, as described in How to write a great article. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, with a well-written introduction and an appropriate series of headings to break up the content. It should have sufficient external literature references, preferably from "hard" (peer-reviewed where appropriate) literature rather than websites. Should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. At the stage where it could at least be considered for featured article status, corresponds to the "Wikipedia 1.0" standard. | Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting. May miss a few relevant points. | Minor edits and adjustments would improve the article, particularly if brought to bear by a subject-matter expert. In particular, issues of breadth, completeness, and balance may need work. Peer-review would be helpful at this stage. | Durian (as of June 2006) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ভাল {{GA-Class}} |
The article has passed through the Good article nomination process and been granted GA status, meeting the good article standards. This should be used for articles that still need some work to reach featured article standards, but that are otherwise good. Good articles that may succeed in FAC should be considered A-Class articles, but having completed the Good article designation process is not a requirement for A-Class. | Useful to nearly all readers. A good treatment of the subject. No obvious problems, gaps, excessive information. Adequate for most purposes, but other encyclopedias could do a better job. | Some editing will clearly be helpful, but not necessary for a good reader experience. If the article is not already fully wikified, now is the time. | Agriculture (as of June 2006) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Importance scale সম্পাদনাThe criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Hinduism. Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.
Importance standards সম্পাদনা
|