|
[[WP:BLOCK|ব্যবহারকারী বাধাগুলো]] ব্যবহারকারীদের শাস্তি দেওয়া, আরও বিঘ্ন রোধ করতে অথবা উইকিপিডিয়াকে রক্ষা করার জন্য কাজ করে। যদি কোনো ব্যবহারকারী [[WP:Vandalism|ধ্বংসপ্রবণতা]] বন্ধ করে দেয় এবং যদি তাদের সম্পাদনার ইতিহাসগুলো দীর্ঘস্থায়ী ধ্বংসরপ্রবণতার প্যাটার্ন নির্দেশ না করে, তাহলে তাদের সতর্ক করার বা বাধা দেওয়ার কোনো প্রয়োজন নেই। বিপরীতভাবে, যদি কোনও ব্যবহারকারী স্পষ্টতই খারাপ বিশ্বাসের ধ্বংসপ্রবণতার মধ্যে থাকে, তবে [[WP:ADMIN|প্রশাসক]] তাদের সাময়িকভাবে বাধা দেওয়ার আগে তাদের সতর্ক করার দরকার নেই। '''টেমপ্লেটগুলো ব্যবহার করার আগে আপনার নিশ্চিত হওয়া উচিত যে আপনি সেগুলোর বিষয়বস্তুর সাথে পরিচিত।''' যদি কোনো টেমপ্লেটের স্বর বা বিষয়বস্তু উপযুক্ত না হয়, তাহলে টেমপ্লেটটি ব্যবহার করবেন না, কারণ এটি মৌলিক [[WP:CIVIL|ভদ্রতা]] লঙ্ঘন করবে।
=== Commitment to civilityভদ্রতা ===
''Quoted & rearranged from:* [[WP:CIVIL]].''<br/> দেখুন।
Incivility – or the appearance of incivility – sometimes arises from placing (inappropriate) warning templates and unprofessionally fighting ([[Wikipedia:Vandalism#What_is_not_vandalism|alleged]]) vandalism.
* ''Be careful with user warning templates''. Be careful about issuing templated messages to editors you're currently involved in a dispute with, and exercise caution when using templated messages for newcomers (see [[Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers]]). Consider using a personal message instead of, or in addition to, the templated message.
* ''Explain yourself''. Insufficient [[WP:EP#Be helpful: explain|explanations]] for edits can be perceived as uncivil. Use good edit summaries, and use the talk page if the edit summary does not provide enough space or if a more substantive debate is likely to be needed.
* ''Be careful with edit summaries''. They are relatively short comments and thus potentially subject to misinterpretation or oversimplification. They cannot be changed after pressing "Save", and are often written in haste, particularly in stressful situations. Remember to [[WP:EP#Be helpful: explain|explain your edit]], especially when things are getting heated; to avoid personal comments about any editors you have disputes with; and to use the talk page to further explain your view of the situation.
* ''Be professional''. Just because we are online and unpaid does not mean we can behave badly to each other. People working together in a newspaper office are not supposed to get into punch-ups in the newsroom because they disagree about how something is worded or whose turn it is to make the coffee. Nor are volunteers working at the animal rescue centre allowed to start screaming at each other over who left ferrets in the filing cabinet or the corn snake in the cutlery drawer. In fact, there's pretty much nowhere where people working together to do something good are allowed to get into fist-fights, shouting matches, hair-pulling or name-calling; the same principle applies here.
* ''Try not to get too intense''. Passion can be misread as aggression, so take great care to avoid the appearance of being heavy-handed or bossy. Nobody likes to be ''bossed about'' by an editor who appears to believe that they are "superior"; nobody likes a bully.
* ''Avoid editing while you're in a bad mood.'' It ''does'' spill over. (See [[WP:EUI|Editing under the influence]])
* ''Take a Real-Life check''. Disengage by ''two'' steps to assess what you're about to say (or have just said). Asking yourself "How would I feel if someone said that to me?" is often not enough, many people can just brush things off, and it's water off a duck's back. To get a better perspective, ask yourself: "How would I feel if someone said that to someone I love who ''cannot'' just "brush it off?" If you would find that unacceptable, then ''do not say it''. And, if you have already said it, strike it and apologise.
== অংশগ্রহণকারী ==
| 