উইকিপিডিয়া:উল্লেখযোগ্যতা (সংগঠন ও কোম্পানি): সংশোধিত সংস্করণের মধ্যে পার্থক্য

# Delete the article by listing it at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion]] if no notable content remains. However, if an article contains only blatant advertising, with no other useful content, it may be tagged per [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion]] instead.

 

The following sections discuss alternate methods for establishing notability in specific situations. '''No organization is considered notable except to the extent that independent sources demonstrate that it has been noticed by people outside of the organization.''' These criteria constitute an optional, alternative method for demonstrating notability. Organizations are considered notable if they meet one of the following sourcing requirements

# these alternate criteria,

''and'' the article complies with the policy [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not]], especially with regards to avoiding indiscriminate inclusion of information.

 

{{shortcut|WP:CLUB|WP:NONPROFIT|WP:NGO}}

Organizations are usually notable if they meet '''both''' of the following standards:

*Caveat – Be cautious of claims that small organizations are national or international in scale. The fact that an organization has branches in multiple countries does not ''necessarily'' mean that its activities are ''truly'' international. Example: a tiny fraternal organization with a total membership of sixty members, worldwide, is not "international in scale" simply because the members live in separate countries and have formed sub-chapters where they live.

 

{{shortcut|WP:BRANCH}}

* As a general rule, the individual chapters of national and international organizations are usually not considered notable enough to warrant a separate article – ''unless'' they are substantially discussed by reliable independent sources that extend beyond the chapter's local area.

* Information on sub-chapters of notable organizations might be included in either prose or [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Embedded lists|a brief list]] in the main article on the organization. If an embedded list becomes too large for the parent article, consideration may be given to [[Wikipedia:Splitting|splitting]] out as a [[WP:LISTCOMPANY|stand-alone list]] only if there are reliable sources dealing with the list as a topic, as with [[Baird's Manual of American College Fraternities]] supporting [[List of Phi Kappa Psi chapters and colonies]]. If an embedded list is too large, but is not notable enough for a stand-alone list, then [[Wikipedia:Handling trivia#Recommendations for handling trivia|consider trimming]].

 

{{shortcut|WP:NSCHOOL|WP:NHSCHOOL}}

All universities, colleges and schools, including high schools, middle schools, primary (elementary) schools, and schools that only provide a support to mainstream education must satisfy either this guideline ([[WP:ORG]]) or the [[WP:GNG|general notability guideline]], or both. For-profit educational organizations and institutions are considered ''commercial organizations'' and must satisfy those criteria. (See also [[WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES]], especially for universities.)

 

{{shortcut|WP:NCHURCH}}

Individual religious organizations, congregations and churches must meet the notability guideline for organizations and companies or the [[WP:GNG|general notability guideline]] or both. The fact that a church building is listed on a major historic register such as the [[National Heritage List for England]] or the [[National Register of Historic Places]] in the U.S. does not necessarily mean that the religious organization that owns or meets in the building is notable. However, it is quite possible for a building to be notable independently from the institution, and then a combined article about the institution and the building is justified.

 

Some commercial organizations meet Wikipedia notability guidelines but care must be taken in determining whether they are truly notable and whether the article is an attempt to use Wikipedia for free advertising. Wikipedia editors should not create articles on commercial organizations for the purpose of overtly or covertly advertising a company. Please see [[WP:NOTADVERTISING]].

{{-}}

Many companies have chains of local stores or franchises that are individually pretty much interchangeable—for instance, a local [[McDonald's]]. Since there is generally very little to say about individual stores or franchises that is not true for the chain in general, Wikipedia should not have articles on such individual stores. In rare cases, an individual location will have architectural peculiarities that makes it notable, such as the [[Shell Service Station (Winston-Salem, North Carolina)]]; however, a series of articles on every single Wal-Mart in China would not be informative. An exception can be made if a major event occurred at a local store; however, this would most likely be created under an article name that describes the ''event'', not the location (see [[San Ysidro McDonald's massacre]] for an example).

 

{{shortcut|WP:PRODUCT|WP:NPRODUCT}}

{{see also|Wikipedia:Notability#Articles not satisfying the notability guidelines}}

Note that a specific product or service may be notable on its own, without the company providing it being notable in its own right.

 

{{Further|WP:FAILN}}

{{Shortcuts|WP:FAILORG|WP:FAILCORP}}