উইকিপিডিয়া:অপসারণ পদ্ধতি: সংশোধিত সংস্করণের মধ্যে পার্থক্য
বিষয়বস্তু বিয়োগ হয়েছে বিষয়বস্তু যোগ হয়েছে
অ +প্রক্রিয়া |
অ →সমাপ্তি আলোচনা: +কোরাম নয় |
||
১৬২ নং লাইন:
{{seealso|উইকিপিডিয়া:নিবন্ধ অপসারণের প্রস্তাবনা}}
{{উইকিপিডিয়া:নিবন্ধ অপসারণের প্রস্তাবনা/প্রশাসকদের নির্দেশাবলী}}
===কোরাম নয়===
{{redirect|WP:Soft Deletion|the failed proposal|WP:Soft deletion (failed proposal)}}
{{shortcut|WP:QUORUM|WP:NOQUORUM|WP:NPASR|WP:SOFTDELETE}}
{{Anchor|Soft deletion}}
If a nomination has received no comments from any editor besides the nominator (or few in the case of AfDs), the discussion may be closed at the closer's discretion and best judgement. Common options include, but are not limited to:
* relisting the discussion (see the section '[[#Relisting discussions|Relisting discussions]]');
* closing as "no consensus" with '''n'''o '''p'''rejudice '''a'''gainst '''s'''peedy '''r'''enomination ('''NPASR'''); and
* closing in favour of the nominator's stated proposal.
* '''Soft deletion''' is a special kind of deletion which may be used after an article's deletion discussion. If a deletion discussion sees very little discussion even after being relisted several times, the administrator can close the discussion as soft delete and delete the page. However, in this case, the article can be restored for any reason on request. If your article was soft-deleted, you can request it be restored at [[Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion|Requests for undeletion]]. The closer should make it clear the deletion is a soft delete as part of the close, ideally with a link to this guideline.
* There is consensus among the community that problematic or likely-problematic articles<ref>Usually articles unreferenced for years</ref> with an appropriate redirection target may be [[WP:BLAR|blanked and redirected]] by any editor if there are no objections. This similarly applies to deletion nominations as well; if no editor suggests that the corresponding article should be kept, then redirection is an option.
==সমাপ্তি আলোচনা==
| |||