প্রধান মেনু খুলুন

পরিবর্তনসমূহ

হালনাগাদ
{{dablink|একটি পাতা অপসারণের জন্য মনোনয়নের নির্দেশাবলীর জন্য, দয়াকরে দেখুন [[উইকিপিডিয়া:অপসারণ নীতি|অপসারণ নীতি]] অথবা [[Wikipedia:Guide to deletion|অপসারণের নির্দেশিকা]]।}}
{{PGen}}
{{subcat guideline|অপসারণ প্রশাসন নির্দেশিকা|Deletionঅপসারণ|WP:XFD|WP:DPR|WP:DELPRO}}
The '''deletion process''' is the [[Wikipedia:Processes|Wikipedia process]] involved in recording and executing the community's decisions to delete or keep a page. In general, administrators are responsible for closing discussions about deletions, but in practice, the various deletion discussions tend to be badly backlogged, and editors in good standing who have not been made administrators ''may'' close deletion discussions under conditions described under [[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Non-administrators closing discussions|non-administrators closing discussions]]. Closing decisions are subject to [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|review]] and, if necessary, may be reopened by any administrator. If this happens, take it only as a sign that the decision may not have been as obvious as you may have thought.
 
The '''deletion process''' is the [[Wikipedia:Processes|Wikipedia process]] involved in implementing and recording the community's decisions to delete or keep pages and media.
People should not close discussions in which they have been involved. Doing so creates an appearance of conflict of interest, and may lead to the closure of the debate being challenged as unfair.
 
Wikipedia has three main methods of deleting pages. A page might qualify for ''[[#Speedy deletion|speedy deletion]]'' if it meets certain specific criteria, and ''[[#Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]]'' may be used to suggest that an article is an uncontroversial candidate for deletion. If not, then a [[#Deletion discussions|''deletion discussion'']] must be held in order to form a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] to delete a page. In general, administrators are responsible for closing these discussions; however, non-administrators in good standing ''may'' close them under specific conditions (see the section '[[#Non-administrators closing discussions|Non-administrators closing discussions]]').
==Speedy deletion==
# Decide whether the page meets one or more of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|criteria for speedy deletion]].
# Delete the page with a good comment in the [[Help:Edit summary|reason for deletion]] field. (This will be automatically recorded in the [[Special:Log/delete|Deletion log]].)
#* Citing the specific [[WP:CSD|criteria for speedy deletion]] in the comment is strongly recommended.
#* It may sometimes be helpful to quote page content in the reason for deletion. But in the case of attack pages ([[WP:CSD#G10|CSD G10]]) please be careful not to quote (potentially libelous) negative comments, so that these do not appear in the log. Likewise, in the case of blatant copyright infringements ([[WP:CSD#G12|CSD G12]]) please do not quote the copyrighted text.
 
'''Note:''' [[Wikipedia:Office actions|Office actions]] and declarations from the [[meta:Board of Trustees|Wikimedia Foundation Board]] or the [[meta:System administrators|system administrators]], particularly concerning copyright, legal issues, or server load, may take priority over community consensus.
==<span id="AFD" /><span id="AfD" />নিবন্ধ অপসারণের প্রক্রিয়া==
{{shortcut|WP:DELPRO#AFD|WP:DPR#AFD}}
{{seealso|উইকিপিডিয়া:নিবন্ধ অপসারণের প্রস্তাবনা}}
{{উইকিপিডিয়া:নিবন্ধ অপসারণের প্রস্তাবনা/প্রশাসকদের নির্দেশাবলী}}
 
{{deletion debates}}
<!--==<span id="MFD" /><span id="MfD" />Miscellany for deletion page==
{{shortcut|WP:DELPRO#MFD|WP:DPR#MFD}}
{{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/প্রশাসকদের নির্দেশাবলী}}
 
==দ্রুত অপসারণ==
==<span id="CFD" /><span id="CfD" />Categories for discussion page==
The '''speedy deletion process''' applies to pages which meet at least one of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|criteria for speedy deletion]], which specify the only cases in which administrators have broad consensus support to, at their discretion, bypass deletion discussion and immediately delete Wikipedia pages or media.
{{shortcut|WP:DELPRO#CFD|WP:DPR#CFD}}
{{Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/প্রশাসকদের নির্দেশাবলী}}
 
'''Before deleting''' a page through the speedy deletion process, verify that it meets at least one of the criteria for speedy deletion, check the [[Wikipedia:Page history|page history]] to assess whether it would instead be possible to [[Help:Reverting|revert]] and salvage a previous version and to determine whether there was a [[Wikipedia:How to fix cut and paste moves|cut-and-paste move]] involved, and search for other information which may impact the need or reason for deletion:
==<span id="TFD" /><span id="TfD" />Templates for deletion page==
* The initial [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]] may have information about the source of or reason for the page.
{{shortcut|WP:DELPRO#TFD|WP:DPR#TFD}}
* The [[Help:Talk page|talk page]] may refer to previous deletion discussions or have ongoing discussion relevant to including the page.
{{Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/প্রশাসকদের নির্দেশাবলী}}
* The [[Help:Log|page log]] may have information about previous deletions that could warrant [[WP:SALT|SALT]]ing the page or keeping it.
* ''[[Special:WhatLinksHere|WhatLinksHere]]'' may show that the page is an oft-referred part of the encyclopedia, or may show other similar pages that warrant deletion. For pages that should not be recreated, incoming links in other pages (except in discussions, archives and tracking pages) should be removed.
 
If a page is not appropriate for speedy deletion, the page must be edited to remove the speedy deletion tag—this will, in turn, remove the page from [[:Category:Candidates for speedy deletion]]. Consider notifying the editor who suggested deletion.
==<span id="RFD" /><span id="RfD" />Redirects for discussion page==
{{shortcut|WP:DELPRO#RFD|WP:DPR#RFD}}
{{Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/প্রশাসকদের নির্দেশাবলী}}
 
'''When deleting''' a page through the speedy deletion process, specify the reason for deletion in the deletion summary so that it will be recorded into the [[Special:Log/delete|deletion log]]. Quoting page content in the deletion summary may be helpful, but '''''must not''''' be done for [[WP:CSD#G10|attack content]] or [[WP:CSD#G12|copyrighted text]]. In some cases, it would be appropriate to notify the page's creator of the deletion.
==<span id="SFD" /><span id="SfD" />Stub types for deletion page==
{{shortcut|WP:DELPRO#SFD|WP:DPR#SFD}}
{{Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/প্রশাসকদের নির্দেশাবলী}}-->
 
==প্রস্তাবিত অপসারণ==
==<span id="IFD" /><span id="IfD" /><span id="FFD" /><span id="FfD" />ফাইল অপসারণের প্রক্রিয়া==
The '''[[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion]] process''' applies to articles that do not meet the stringent criteria for speedy deletion, but for which it is believed that deletion would be uncontroversial. For instructions on handling articles that have been proposed for deletion, see [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion#Deletion]].
{{shortcut|WP:DELPRO#FFD|WP:DPR#FFD}}
{{উইকিপিডিয়া:ফাইল অপসারণ/শীর্ষ/প্রশাসকদের নির্দেশাবলী}}
 
==অপসারণ আলোচনা==
==<span id="DRV" /><span id="DRV" />[[Wikipedia:Deletion review]] discussions==
The '''deletion discussion processes''' apply to pages which are formally nominated for deletion through an appropriate deletion discussion venue. Although the steps for closing deletion discussions vary from one deletion discussion venue to another, a few general principles apply at all venues.
{{shortcut|WP:DELPRO#DRV|WP:DPR#DRV}}
{{Wikipedia:Deletion review/প্রশাসকদের নির্দেশাবলী}}
 
===ঐক্যমত===
<!--==Special situations==
{{main|Wikipedia:Consensus}}
Some deletion discussions require a few extra steps to close completely.
Consensus is formed through the careful consideration, dissection and eventual synthesis of each side's arguments, and '''should not be calculated solely by the balance of votes'''.
 
Outcomes should reflect the [[Wikipedia:Deletion guidelines for administrators#Rough consensus|rough consensus]] reached in the deletion discussion and [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Level of consensus|community consensus on a wider scale]]. (While [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Consensus can change|consensus can change]], consensus among a limited group of editors, at one place and time, cannot override community consensus on a wider scale.)
===Relisting discussions===
{{shortcut|WP:RELIST}}
The intent of the '''deletion process''' is to attempt to determine the [[WP:CON|consensus]] of whether an article should be deleted or not.
 
If inappropriate [[Wikipedia:Canvassing|canvassing]] has taken place, evaluate whether it influenced the outcome of the discussion in a way that compromised the standard consensus-building process.
However, if at the end of the initial seven day period, an [[WP:XFD|XFD]] discussion has only one or two commenting editors (including the nominator), and/or if it seems to the closer to be lacking arguments based on policy, it may be appropriate for the closer to relist the discussion, with a goal of obtaining further sufficient discussion in order to determine consensus, and with the understanding that it may be subject to being closed once consensus can be determined, without necessarily waiting a further seven days.
 
===সংরক্ষণ এবং অপসারণ===
That said, relisting a debate should not be a substitute for a no-consensus closure. If closer feels that there has been substantive debate, and disparate opinions supported by policy have been expressed, and it appears that consensus will not be achieved, a no-consensus close may be preferable.
{{anchor|Common outcomes}}
{{See also|Wikipedia:Guide to deletion#Recommendations and outcomes|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes}}
A deletion discussion may end with one of a number of distinct outcomes, with certain outcomes being more common at certain deletion discussion venues. However, three outcomes are common to all venues: ''keep'', ''delete'' and ''no consensus''.
 
A '''keep''' outcome reflects a [[Wikipedia:Deletion guidelines for administrators#Rough consensus|rough consensus]] to retain (i.e. not delete) a page, though not necessarily in its current form. To implement a 'keep' outcome: close the deletion discussion as 'keep'; edit the page to remove the deletion notice; and record the outcome on the page's [[Help:Talk page|talk page]] using one of several venue-specific templates (see '[[#Step-by-step instructions|Step-by-step instructions]]' for details).
If a debate has already been relisted once, the closer should consider carefully if a no-consensus close would be more appropriate than a second relisting. If further discussion is unlikely to bring consensus, then the discussion should simply be closed.
 
A '''delete''' outcome reflects a rough consensus to remove (i.e. not retain) a page, including its entire revision history. To implement a 'delete' outcome: close the deletion discussion as 'delete'; delete the page, and link to the deletion discussion in the deletion summary; and, if the page should not be recreated, remove incoming links in other pages (except in discussions, archives and tracking pages).
Note that some deletion discussions (such as for [[WP:CFD|categories]], [[WP:RFD|redirects]], and [[WP:IFD|images and media]]) can be closed as '''delete''', rather than relisted, if nobody other than the nominator comments.
 
A '''no consensus''' outcome reflects the lack of a rough consensus for any one particular action. To implement a 'no consensus' outcome: close the deletion discussion as 'no consensus'; edit the page to remove the deletion notice; and record the outcome on the page's talk page using one of several venue-specific templates (see '[[#Step-by-step instructions|Step-by-step instructions]]' for details).
When relisting a discussion, it should be '''removed from the log for its original date''' and moved to the current date's log where the discussion will continue.-->
 
'''Note:''' Deletion discussions concerning [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|biographies of living persons]] who are relatively unknown, non-public figures, where the subject has requested deletion ''and'' there is no rough consensus to keep, may be closed as 'delete' per the [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion policy]].
===Transwiki===
 
===প্রক্রিয়াগত অবসান===
In certain situations, a deletion discussion may require a "procedural closure"—a null outcome based on the circumstances of the deletion nomination rather than the merits of the page being discussed. Situations where a procedural closure may be appropriate include:
* The nominated page was not tagged with a corresponding deletion notice. The best course of action is to add the tag and note that you've done so - the time you place the tag would then be treated as the nomination time.
* The nominated page is currently linked from the [[Main Page]]. If there are legitimate concerns, please use [[Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors]] to have the link removed before nominating the article.
* A subsequent deletion discussion which immediately challenges the outcome of the prior deletion discussion, where a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]] clearly would be more appropriate. List it at deletion review on the nominator's behalf first, then close the deletion discussion.
* The deletion discussion is listed at the incorrect venue, e.g., a discussion for a file that is hosted on [[Commons:|Commons]], or for a category listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]. This includes discussions that the chosen venue is unable to address.
**When doing such a close, first list the topic at the correct venue. Then, close the discussion and provide a link to the new discussion. Never close a discussion as a wrong venue without opening a discussion at an appropriate one.
 
A deletion discussion that is poorly formatted should not be closed for this reason alone, in order to avoid [[WP:BITE|biting]] new users. Instead, [[WP:SOFIXIT|fix it]].
 
===প্রারম্ভিক অবসান===
In general, deletion discussions should remain open for at least seven days to allow interested editors adequate time to participate. However, under certain circumstances, discussions may be closed prior to the seven-day timeframe.
 
Closers should apply good judgment before speedily closing a discussion, since often it is best to allow the discussion to continue for the entirety of the seven-day period.
 
;Withdrawn nomination{{Anchor|Withdrawn nomination}}{{Shortcut|WP:WITHDRAWN}}
The nominator may withdraw the nomination at any time. However, if subsequent editors have added substantive comments in good faith, the discussion should not be speedily closed. A nomination should not be withdrawn in order to try to short-circuit an ongoing discussion.
 
;Speedy keep<span id="Speedy keep" />
 
{{main|Wikipedia:Speedy keep}}
A "speedy keep" outcome is appropriate when the nomination unquestionably is an attempt to vandalize or to otherwise create disruption. For example:
* Nominations which are clearly an attempt to end an editing dispute through deletion (possibly in an attempt to [[WP:GAME|game the system]]), when [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]] would be a more appropriate course.
* Nominations which are made solely to provide a forum for disruption (this includes [[WP:HARRASS|editor harassment]]).
* <span id="policy" />The nominated page is a policy or guideline. The deletion process is not a forum for policy concerns.
* [[Frivolous or vexatious]] nominations (recently featured articles, for example). This includes re-nominating the same page with the same arguments immediately after they were strongly rejected in a recently closed deletion discussion.
* Nominations which are so erroneous that they indicate that the nominator has not even read the article in question.
* The nominator is [[Wikipedia:Banning policy|banned]], so their edits are not to be retained. In that case, the ''nominated page'' is speedily kept while the ''nomination'' can be tagged with {{tl|db-g5}} and speedily deleted as a banned contribution. However, if subsequent editors have added substantive comments in good faith, the nomination should not be speedily closed (though the nominator's opinion will be discounted in the closure decision).
 
;Speedy delete{{Anchor|Speedy delete close}}{{Shortcut|WP:SPEEDYCLOSE}}
{{see also|#Speedy deletion}}
When the nominated page unambiguously falls under at least one of the criteria for speedy deletion, particularly [[WP:CSD#G10|criterion G10]] (attack page) or [[WP:CSD#G12|criterion G12]] (copyright violation), it is not necessary to wait until the end of the discussion period.
;Snowball clause<span id="Snowball clause" /><span id="SNOW" />
{{main|Wikipedia:Snowball clause}}
When the outcome of the deletion discussion is [[almost certain]], such that there is not a "snowball's chance in hell" that the outcome will be anything other than what is expected.
 
'''Note:''' The "snowball clause" exists to avoid [[WP:NOT#BUREAUCRACY|process for the sake of process]], and should not be invoked in situations where a particular outcome is merely "likely" or "highly likely", or where there is genuine and reasoned disagreement.
 
===কোরাম নয়===
{{redirect|WP:Soft Deletion|the failed proposal|WP:Soft deletion (failed proposal)}}
{{shortcut|WP:QUORUM|WP:NOQUORUM|WP:NPASR|WP:SOFTDELETE}}
{{Anchor|Soft deletion}}
If a nomination has received no comments from any editor besides the nominator (or few in the case of AfDs), the discussion may be closed at the closer's discretion and best judgment. Common options include, but are not limited to:
* relisting the discussion (see the section '[[#Relisting discussions|Relisting discussions]]');
* closing as "no consensus" with '''n'''o '''p'''rejudice '''a'''gainst '''s'''peedy '''r'''enomination ('''NPASR'''); and
* closing in favour of the nominator's stated proposal.
* '''Soft deletion''' is a special kind of deletion which may be used after an article's deletion discussion. If a deletion discussion sees very little discussion even after being relisted several times, the administrator can close the discussion as soft delete and delete the page. However, in this case, the article can be restored for any reason on request. If your article was soft-deleted, you can request it be restored at [[Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion|Requests for undeletion]].
 
===অন্যান্য ফলাফল===
 
Other possible outcomes include, but are not limited to:
*'''[[WP:Disambiguation|Disambiguate]]''' - Used for articles and redirects. If the discussion concludes that the title can refer to many topics, it can be changed to a disambiguation page to list all of them.
*'''[[Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Incubation|Incubate]]''' - Used at articles for deletion. This changes the article into a draft to be improved so that it meets inclusion requirements.
*'''Delete but allow undeleting with [[Wikipedia:File copyright tags|an appropriate licence]]''' - Used for files. If a file is only deleted due to copyright issues, it could be re-uploaded if these issues are resolved
*'''[[WP:Lists|Listify]]''' - Used for categories. This means to delete the category and create a list article instead.
*'''[[WP:Merging|Merge]]''' - Used for articles, categories and templates. This combines two separate pages into a single page. Merge votes should be [[WP:Merge what?|specific and clear]]. If you wish to merge templates or categories, use the deletion discussions. If you wish to merge articles, do not use a deletion discussion, but instead discuss it on the talk page.
*'''Redirect''' - Used for articles and templates and sometimes other pages. This would be used if the page has no unique and usable content, but information about the topic is found in another article.
*'''Rename''' - Used only for categories, where deletion is required to change the name. Other pages may be renamed without deletion by using the [[WP:MOVE|move]] function.
*'''Retarget''' - Used for redirects. This means that the redirect should lead to a different page.
*'''Userfy''' - Used for articles, templates and miscellaneous pages. This would move the page into the creator's userspace so that they may make improvements. If [[WP:Essays|Wikipedia essays]] are nominated, they will sometimes be moved to userspace if they are found to violate policies or guidelines.
 
==<span id="AFD" /><span id="AfD" />নিবন্ধ অপসারণের প্রক্রিয়া==
{{shortcut|WP:DELPRO#AFD|WP:DPR#AFD}}
{{seealso|উইকিপিডিয়া:নিবন্ধ অপসারণের প্রস্তাবনা}}
{{উইকিপিডিয়া:নিবন্ধ অপসারণের প্রস্তাবনা/প্রশাসকদের নির্দেশাবলী}}
 
==সমাপ্তি আলোচনা==
Discussions are usually closed after seven days. If there is a lack of comments, or the action to take is unclear, the discussion may be relisted for an addition seven days. Usually, both closing and relisting are administrator actions.
 
===<span id="NAC" />Non-administrators closing discussions===
{{shortcut|WP:DPR#NAC|WP:NACD}}
{{further|Wikipedia:Non-admin closure}}
In general, [[Wikipedia:Administrators|administrators]] are responsible for closing deletion discussions. However, at times the many discussion venues become backlogged. Registered editors who are not administrators ''may'' close deletion discussions, with the following provisions:
* Deletion discussions must be decided in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] and taking account of Wikipedia [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|policies and guidelines]]. If you are not familiar with [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion policy]] or the workings of deletion discussions, please avoid closing discussions.
* Non-administrators should not close discussions in which they lack the technical ability to act upon the outcome, such as deletion.
* Close calls and controversial decisions are better left to an administrator.
* In cases where an administrator has deleted a page, including by speedy deletion, but forgot to close the discussion, anyone may close the discussion provided that the administrator's name and deletion summary are included in the closing rationale.
* Closing discussions in which you have offered an opinion or for a page in which you have a [[Wikipedia:Vested interest|vested interest]] (i.e., a page that you have edited heavily) should be avoided. The sole exception is if you are closing your own withdrawn nomination as a [[Wikipedia:Speedy keep|speedy keep]] and all other viewpoints expressed were for keep as well.
* Non-administrators closing deletion discussions are recommended to disclose their status in the closing decision.
 
Decisions are subject to review and may be reopened by an administrator. If this happens, take it only as a sign that the decision was not as obvious as you thought. The reopening of the discussion should include an appropriate notice as per [[WP:TPO]].
 
Participants, including participating administrators, should not reopen non-admin closures. If this happens, any editor other than the closer may restore the closure with an appropriate notice as per [[WP:TPO]]. Notice of the restoration should be posted at [[WP:RFPP]].
 
==বিশেষ পরিস্থিতি==
===ট্রান্সউইকি===
If consensus indicates a [[m:Help:Transwiki|transwiki]] should take place, but you do not want to complete the transwiki process immediately:
#add Add a new entry to [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old/Transwiki]].
#add Add the appropriate tag to the article:
#*{{tl|Copy to Wiktionary}}
#*{{tl|Copy to Wikisource}}
#*{{tl|Copy to Wikimedia Commons}}
 
===বহু পরিবর্তনসহ পাতা===
===Untranscluded discussions===
The deletion of pages with long histories may impact server performance. As a precaution, therefore, deletions of pages with more than [[mw:Manual:$wgDeleteRevisionsLimit|5,000 revisions]] require the special "bigdelete" user right, which administrators do not have. Such deletions can be requested of stewards at [[:meta:Steward requests/Miscellaneous]].
Sometimes, AFD discussions become excessively long and are temporarily [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maintenance|untranscluded]] from the day's AFD page. This is most often done through the creation of a <tt>/temp</tt> page for the AFD discussion. If you close one of these very large discussions:
# Edit the AFD day page to re-transclude the long discussion.
# Delete the <tt>/temp</tt> page.
 
==আরও দেখুন==
==All others ==
{{Columns-list|2|
* If a separate discussion page was created, follow the AFD procedures above.
* If no separate discussion page was created, please consider creating one. If you choose not to, at least copy the discussion onto the article's Talk page.
 
==<span id="NAC" />Non-administrators closing discussions==
{{shortcut|WP:DPR#NAC}}
{{seealso|Wikipedia:Non-admin closure}}
In general, administrators are responsible for closing discussions about deletions. However, at times the various deletion discussions become backlogged. Editors in good standing who have not been made administrators ''may'' close deletion discussions, with the following provisions:
* Deletion discussions must be decided in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] and taking account of Wikipedia [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|policies and guidelines]]. If you are not familiar with [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion policy]] or the workings of deletion discussions, it is best that you only close discussions with unambiguous results.
** Non-administrators should not close even unanimous "delete" decisions, as they lack the account feature to delete pages (that feature is only turned on for admins).
** Close calls and controversial or ambiguous decisions should be left to an administrator.
** In cases when an administrator has deleted a page and overlooks closing the discussion, the administrator's name and deletion summary should be included in the closing rationale.
* Closing discussions in which you have offered an opinion or for a page that you have edited heavily presents a conflict of interest and should be avoided. The sole exception is if you are closing your own withdrawn nomination as a [[Wikipedia:Speedy keep|speedy keep]] and all other viewpoints expressed were for keep as well.
Non-administrators closing deletion discussions are recommended to disclose their status in the closing decision. Decisions are subject to review and may be reopened by any administrator. If this happens, take it only as a sign that the decision was not as unambiguous as you thought.
 
==See also==
*[[Template:afd top]]
*[[Template:afd bottom]]
*[[Wikipedia:Speedy keep|Speedy keep]]
*[[Wikipedia:Alternative outlets|Alternative outlets to recreate deleted articles]]
*[[Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions|Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions]]
*[[Wikipedia:Arguments Articlesto foravoid in image deletion/Common outcomesdiscussions|DeletionArguments commonto avoid in image deletion outcomesdiscussions]]
*[[Wikipedia:Deletion debatesand deletionism|Deletion debatesand deletionism]]
*[[:Category:Deletion archival templates|Deletion archival templates]]
*[[Wikipedia:Deletion guidelines for administrators|Deletion guidelines for administrators]]
*[[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|Deletion policy]]
*[[Wikipedia:DeletionArticles for reviewdeletion/Precedents|Deletion reviewprecedents]]
*[[User:GRBerry/DRVGuide|Deletion review guide]]
*[[Wikipedia:Guide to deletion|Guide to deletion]]
*[[Wikipedia:Introduction to deletion process|Introduction to deletion process]]
*[[Wikipedia:List of policies to cite in deletion debates|List of policies to cite in deletion debates]]
*[[Wikipedia:Mass nomination|Mass nomination]]
*[[Wikipedia:Page blanking|Page blanking]]
*[[Wikipedia:Undeletion policy|Undeletion policy]]
}}
*[[Wikipedia:No blank pages|No blank pages]]
 
 
 
[[Categoryবিষয়শ্রেণী:উইকিপিডিয়া নীতিমালা ও নির্দেশাবলীঅপসারণ|{{PAGENAME}}]]
[[বিষয়শ্রেণী:উইকিপিডিয়া প্রক্রিয়া|{{PAGENAME}}]]
[[Category:উইকিপিডিয়ার প্রশাসন]]
<!--BetacommandBot Exclude-->
৪৩,২৪৩টি

সম্পাদনা