উইকিপিডিয়া:সংঘাত নিরসন: সংশোধিত সংস্করণের মধ্যে পার্থক্য
বিষয়বস্তু বিয়োগ হয়েছে বিষয়বস্তু যোগ হয়েছে
PGen using AWB |
Jayantanth (আলোচনা | অবদান) + |
||
২৭ নং লাইন:
সংঘাত নিরসনের এই পর্যায়ে বা অন্য যে কোন পর্যায়ে অন্যপক্ষের সাথে আলোচনা করা, কেবল সংঘাত নিরসনের পরবর্তী পর্যায়ে যাওয়ার জন্য মুখরক্ষার ব্যাপার নয়। আলোচনায় সদিচ্ছার অভাব দেখালে এটাই প্রমাণিত হয় যে আপনি নিরসনের বদলে সংঘাতটিকে আরও উসকে দিতে চাচ্ছেন। এ ধরণের আচরণের ফলে আপনি লোকজনের সহানুভূতি হারাতে পারেন, আর এতে সংঘাত নিরসনের পরবর্তী পর্যায়গুলোতে আপনার অংশগ্রহণে সীমাবদ্ধ হওয়ার সুযোগ আছে। অন্য দিকে আপনি যদি অন্য পক্ষের সাথে আন্তরিকভাবে ঐক্যমতে আসার জন্য নিরবচ্ছিন্ন আলোচনা চালিয়ে যান, এবং সেটা যদি শুরুতে সংঘাত নিরসনে সফল নাও হয়, তবে আপনি যে উইকিপিডিয়ার নীতিমালা অনুসারে সমাধান খুঁজতে আগ্রহী তা প্রকাশ পায়।
==Resolving disputes ==
{{see|Wikipedia:Requesting dispute resolution}}
If the previous steps fail to resolve the dispute, try one of the following methods. Which ones you choose and in what order depends on the nature of the dispute and the preferences of people involved.
===Sensitive and privacy-related issues===
: ''See: [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee]], [[Wikipedia:CheckUser]], [[Wikipedia:Oversight]],[[Wikipedia:Harassment]], and [[Wikipedia:OTRS]].''
A small number of disputes involve sensitive or non-public information. These include issues where an [[WP:AC|Arbitrator]], [[WP:CHECK|Checkuser]] or [[WP:SIGHT|Oversighter]] has stated a privacy issue exists in the case, and disputes where there is a concern of a sensitive or private nature. Examples:
:* '''Non-public details''' - Issues where details and evidence are not accessible to all participants or to the community as a whole. This can also happen due to copyright or privacy reasons, [[WP:BLP|BLP]], or when the material is on an unsuitable [[WP:EL|external link]];
:* '''"Outing" concerns''' - When discussion may in effect mean "[[WP:OUTING|outing]]", for example if there is a concern that a user is editing with a secret conflict of interest and the evidence would tend to identify them;
:* '''Serious matters''' - The issue involves legal concerns, harassment, or allegations that are very serious or perhaps defamatory;
:* '''Advice on divisive and sensitive issues''' - The issue may potentially be very divisive and advice is needed on how best to handle it. ([[WP:ADMINSOCK|sock-puppetry by an administrator]] is one example)
Disputes or issues of this kind should usually be referred to the [[WP:FUNC|functionaries mailing list]] or [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]]. In some cases it may be possible to seek advice from an uninvolved trusted administrator by IRC, email or other private means.
==== Actions tagged as CheckUser, Oversight, or OTRS ====
''These should <u>not</u> be reverted without careful checking beforehand''. The presumption is that they have a good reason, and those aware of the reason may need time to recheck, consult, and respond. Sometimes the relevant talk page or other wiki pages will have more details and these are always a good first place to check. Such actions, if disputed, should initially be raised (by email if necessary) with the agent or functionary concerned. If they cannot be resolved in this manner, then after a reasonable time they may need to be referred for review to [[WP:AC|Arbcom]] or the [[WP:FUNC|functionaries mailing list]] (for CheckUser and Oversighter).
Ultimately, all English Wikipedia-based actions are open to the scrutiny of the Arbitration Committee, as the final stage of dispute resolution on the English Wikipedia, and as the body ultimately responsible for non-public information and privacy related issues on the wiki.
===Editor assistance===
[[Wikipedia:Editor assistance|Editor assistance]] helps editors find someone experienced to provide you one-on-one advice and feedback. While not a required part of dispute resolution, it is designed to help you understand how to clearly and civilly express your views and work toward consensus. You may request an assistant's help at any time, whether you're involved in dispute resolution or not. Assistants can also help you find the best way to resolve your dispute or issue.
===Ask for a third opinion===
If you need neutral outside opinions in a dispute involving '''only two''' editors, turn to [[Wikipedia:Third opinion]].
===Ask about the subject===
Ask at a subject-specific [[Wikipedia:WikiProject]] talk page. Usually, such projects are listed on top of the article talk page.
===Ask about a policy===
Ask at a [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|policy talk page]] relevant to the issue.
===Ask for help at a relevant noticeboard===
{{Policy shortcut|WP:SEEKHELP}}
If your dispute is related to one of the following topics, you may wish to post about it in one of these locations, to get the opinions of other editors familiar with similar disputes:
* [[WP:BLPN|Biographies of Living Persons noticeboard]] – to raise alerts about problems with a living person's biography
* [[WP:COIN|Conflict of Interest noticeboard]] – to raise alerts about possible COI
* [[Wikipedia:Content noticeboard|Content noticeboard]] – for other content issues that do not fit in the above or are of more general nature.
* [[WP:ELN|External links noticeboard]] – for questions about [[WP:EL|external links]] that are ''not'' being used to verify article content.
* [[Wikipedia:Ethnic and cultural conflicts noticeboard|Ethnic and cultural conflicts noticeboard]] – for issues related to national, religious, ethnic, or other cultural conflicts
* [[WP:FICT/N|Fiction noticeboard]] – for issues related to topics about works of fiction
* [[WP:FTN|Fringe theories noticeboard]] – to report theories that may be being given [[WP:UNDUE|undue weight]]
* [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard|Neutrality noticeboard]] – for issues about whether an article is meeting [[WP:NPOV]] and [[WP:UNDUE]].
* [[WP:NORN|No Original Research noticeboard]] – to ask about material that might be [[WP:NOR|original research]] or [[WP:SYN|original synthesis]].
* [[WP:RSN|Reliable Sources noticeboard]] – for discussion of whether or not a source is reliable
* [[WP:SPI|Sockpuppet investigations]] – to ask for help in tracking down [[WP:SOCK|sockpuppets]]
===For incivility===
Turn to [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts]] for problems with [[WP:CIVIL|uncivil]] editors. First, however, consider [[WP:Ignore personal attacks|ignoring it]] – you can often get much more accomplished by rising above uncivil comments, and staying focussed on the task at hand.
===Request a comment===
Turn to [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment]], the main avenue for disputes about user conduct. While Request for Comment can be used for disputes about User Conduct, you can also request comments on articles, templates, categories, policies and guidelines.
===Informal mediation===
If things are getting a bit tricky, it might be useful to ask some cool heads to look in and help out. Sometimes editors who provide third opinions or respond to requests for comments may be willing to help mediate a dispute, if it is requested. The [[Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal|Mediation Cabal]] also assists in settling disputes without turning to formal mediation, and is a good place to learn dispute resolution techniques.
===Formal mediation===
[[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation|Request formal mediation]] of the dispute from the [[Wikipedia:Mediation Committee|Mediation Committee]]. [[Wikipedia:Mediation|Mediation]] is a voluntary process in which a neutral person works with the parties to a dispute. The mediator helps guide the parties into reaching an agreement that can be acceptable to everyone. When requesting formal mediation, be prepared to show that you tried to resolve the dispute using the steps listed above, and that all parties to the dispute are in agreement to mediate. Mediation cannot take place if all parties are not willing to take part. Mediation is only for disputes about Article Content, not for complaints about user conduct.
===Conduct a survey===
If consensus is difficult to gauge from discussion alone, consider conducting a survey of opinion to clarify the issues in the discussion. Note that a survey cannot ''generate'' consensus, but is helpful for understanding it. Similarly, if you believe that users are ignoring a consensus, a survey cannot force those users to accept your proposed consensus – although a survey ''might'' assist users in understanding the balance of opinions and reasons for those opinions on a given dispute, it can also easily degenerate into an argument over whether a particular survey is fairly constructed or representative. See [[Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion]] for reasons why discussion is necessary and superior to voting.
==If the situation is urgent==
*To report '''urgent''' violations of Wikipedia's policies on [[WP:NPA|Personal Attacks]], please raise them at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]].
* To report improper '''usernames''', see [[Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention|usernames for administrator attention]].
* To report '''edit warring''', see the [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR|administrators' 3RR noticeboard]].
* To request permanent '''[[Wikipedia:oversight|deletion]] of personal information''', see [[Wikipedia:Requests for oversight|requests for oversight]].
* To report suspected '''sockpuppetry''', see [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations|sockpuppet investigations]].
* If you are '''blocked''' and wish to request to be unblocked, please place the code: <tt>'''<nowiki>{{unblock|</nowiki>''' your reason for unblock'''<nowiki> }}</nowiki>'''</tt> – on your talk page. You may also contact the blocking admin via email (navigate to their userpage or user talk page and click "E-mail this user").
If a user's conduct needs other urgent attention from an administrator, report it to [[WP:AN|the Administrators' Noticeboard]]. The Administrators' Noticeboard is '''not''' the place to raise disputes over content, or reports of abusive behaviour. [[WP:ADMIN|Administrators]] are not referees, and have limited authority to deal with abusive editors.
== Last resort: Arbitration==
{{see|Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Wikipedia:Arbitration policy|Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration}}
{{See also|Wikipedia:Arbitration guide}}
If you have taken all other reasonable steps to resolve the dispute, ''and the dispute is not over the content of an article'', you can [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration|request Arbitration]]. Be prepared to show that you tried to resolve the dispute by other means. [[Arbitration]] differs from Mediation in that the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] will consider the case and issue a decision, instead of merely assisting the parties in reaching an agreement. If the issue is decided by Arbitration, you will be expected to abide by the result. If the case involves serious user misconduct, Arbitration may result in a number of serious consequences up to totally banning someone from editing, as laid out in the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration policy|Arbitration policy]]. Note that [[Arbitration]] is normally for disputes about user conduct, while [[Mediation]] is normally for disputes about article content.
== Words of caution ==
Dispute resolution is sometimes used by editors to try to [[Wikipedia:Gaming the system|game the system]]. This generally backfires badly. Remember that dispute resolution mechanisms are ultimately there to enable editors to collaboratively write an encyclopedia – not to win personal or political battles.
==See also ==
* [[Wikipedia:Accuracy dispute]]
* [[Wikipedia:Candor]]
* [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing]]
* [[Wikipedia:Don't be a fanatic]]
* [[Wikipedia:Edit war]]
* [[Wikipedia:Etiquette]]
* [[Wikipedia:Mea culpa]]
* [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view#Situations and handling]]
* [[Wikipedia:No angry mastodons]]
* [[Wikipedia:NPOV dispute]]
* [[Wikipedia:Precedents]]
* [[Wikipedia:WikiWar]]
* [[MeatBall:ConflictResolution]]
{{Wikipedia policies and guidelines}}
[[Category:উইকিপিডিয়া নীতিমালা ও নির্দেশাবলী]]
[[en:Wikipedia:Dispute resolution]]
[[af:Wikipedia:Geskilbeslegting]]
[[am:Wikipedia:Resolving disputes]]
[[ar:ويكيبيديا:حل النزاع]]
[[br:Wikipedia:Argerzhadur evit diskoulmañ tabutoù]]
[[bn:উইকিপেডিয়া:সংঘাত নিরসন]]
[[bg:Уикипедия:Разрешаване на спорове]]
[[ca:Viquipèdia:Resolució de conflictes]]
[[cs:Wikipedie:Řešení konfliktů]]
[[fa:ویکیپدیا:حل اختلاف]]
[[fr:Wikipédia:Résolution de conflit]]
[[gl:Wikipedia:Votacións/Como resolver disputas]]
[[ko:위키백과:분쟁 해결]]
[[hr:Wikipedija:Rješavanje sporova]]
[[id:Wikipedia:Penyelesaian perselisihan]]
[[it:Wikipedia:Risoluzione dei conflitti]]
[[kk:Уикипедия:Пікірталас шешімі]]
[[lt:Vikipedija:Konfliktų sprendimas]]
[[hu:Wikipédia:Vitarendezés]]
[[mk:Википедија:Разрешување на спорови]]
[[ml:വിക്കിപീഡിയ:തര്ക്കപരിഹാരം]]
[[ms:Wikipedia:Penyelesaian pertikaian]]
[[nl:Wikipedia:Conflictafhandeling]]
[[ja:Wikipedia:論争の解決]]
[[pt:Wikipedia:Como resolver disputas]]
[[ro:Wikipedia:Rezolvarea disputelor]]
[[ru:Википедия:Разрешение конфликтов]]
[[scn:Risoluzzioni di li sciarri]]
[[simple:Wikipedia:Solving disputes]]
[[sk:Wikipédia:Riešenie konfliktov]]
[[sv:Wikipedia:Konflikthantering]]
[[te:వికీపీడియా:వివాద పరిష్కారం]]
[[tr:Vikipedi:Anlaşmazlıkların giderilmesi]]
[[uk:Вікіпедія:Вирішення конфліктів]]
[[vi:Wikipedia:Giải quyết mâu thuẫn]]
[[zh:Wikipedia:争论的解决]]
| |||