উইকিপিডিয়া: সংশোধিত সংস্করণের মধ্যে পার্থক্য
| [অপরীক্ষিত সংশোধন] | [পরীক্ষিত সংশোধন] |
বিষয়বস্তু বিয়োগ হয়েছে বিষয়বস্তু যোগ হয়েছে
Lazy-restless (আলোচনা | অবদান) |
Lazy-restless (আলোচনা | অবদান) |
||
১৯৯ নং লাইন:
In contrast, academic writing in Wikipedia has evolved in recent years and has been found to increase student interest, personal connection to the product, creativity in material processing, and international collaboration in the learning process.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.quest-cdecjournal.it/focus.php?id=403|title=Wikishtetl: Commemorating Jewish Communities that Perished in the Holocaust through the Wikipedia Platform :: Quest CDEC journal|website=www.quest-cdecjournal.it|access-date=January 15, 2020}}</ref> Some academics suggest ‘Verifiability by respected sources’ as an indicator for assessing the quality of Wikipedia articles at the higher education level.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Petiška|first=Eduard|last2=Moldan|first2=Bedřich|date=December 9, 2019|title=Indicator of quality for environmental articles on Wikipedia at the higher education level|journal=Journal of Information Science|language=en-US|pages=|doi=10.1177/0165551519888607|issn=0165-5515}}</ref>-->
===খোলামেলা বিষয়বস্তু===
সচিত্র যৌন বিষয়বস্তু অনুমোদনের জন্য উইকিপিডিয়া সমালোচিত হয়েছে। শিশু নিরাপত্তা অধিকারকর্মীগণ বলেন উইকিপিডিয়ার অনেক পাতাতেই সচিত্র যৌন বিষয়বস্তু দেখা যায়, কোন সতর্কবার্তা বা বয়স যাচাইয়ের ব্যবস্থা ছাড়াই।<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.livenews.com.au/Articles/2008/09/09/Wikipedia_attacked_over_porn_pages |title=Wikipedia attacked over porn pages |publisher=Livenews.com.au |accessdate=March 31, 2010 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080917145158/http://livenews.com.au/Articles/2008/09/09/Wikipedia_attacked_over_porn_pages |archivedate=September 17, 2008 }}</ref>
<!--{{anchor|Wikipe-tan}}The Wikipedia article ''[[Virgin Killer]]''—a 1976 album from German heavy metal band [[Scorpions (band)|Scorpions]]—features a picture of the album's original cover, which depicts a naked [[prepubescent]] girl. In December 2008, the [[Internet Watch Foundation]], a nonprofit, nongovernment-affiliated organization, added the article to its blacklist, criticizing the inclusion of the picture as "distasteful". As a result, access to the article was blocked for four days by most Internet service providers in the United Kingdom.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/08/AR2008120803188.html|work=The Washington Post|date=December 10, 2008|first=JR|last=Raphael|title=Wikipedia Censorship Sparks Free Speech Debate|accessdate=May 10, 2009}}</ref> Seth Finkelstein writing for ''[[The Guardian]]'' argues that the debate over the album cover masks a structural lack of accountability on Wikipedia, in particular when it comes to sexual content.<ref name="Finkelstein">{{citation|url=https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2008/dec/18/wikipedia-jimmy-wales|title= Sting in the Scorpions tale is the exposure of Wiki's weakness|author=Seth Finkelstein|date=December 18, 2008|accessdate=May 23, 2018|publisher=The Guardian}}</ref> For example, the deletion by Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales of images of [[lolicon]] versions of the character [[Wikipedia:Wikipe-tan|Wikipe-tan]] created a minor controversy on the topic. The deletion was taken as endorsement of the non-lolicon images of Wikipe-tan, which Wales later had to explicitly deny: "I don't like Wikipe-tan and never have."<ref>{{citation|url=http://www.hopesandfears.com/hopes/future/technology/216543-manga-avatars-windows|title=Meet the manga avatars of your favorite tech platroms|author1=Dorothy Howard|author2-link=The Otaku Encyclopedia|author2=Patrick W. Galbraith|publisher=Hopes&Fears|date=November 20, 2015|accessdate=May 23, 2018}}</ref> Finkelstein sees Wikipedia as composed of [[fiefdoms]], which makes it difficult for the Wikipedia community to deal with such issues, and sometimes necessitates top-down intervention.<ref name="Finkelstein" />
In April 2010, [[Larry Sanger]], a co-founder of Wikipedia who had left the organization eight years previously, [[Reporting of lolicon images on Wikimedia Commons|wrote a letter to the Federal Bureau of Investigation]], outlining his concerns that two categories of images on Wikimedia Commons contained child pornography, and were in violation of United States federal obscenity law. Sanger also expressed concerns about access to the images on Wikipedia in schools.<ref name=AFP>{{cite news|last1=Agence France-Presse|title=Wikipedia rejects child porn accusation|url=https://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/wikipedia-rejects-child-porn-accusation-20100428-tsvh.html|work=The Sydney Morning Herald|date=29 April 2010}}</ref> Sanger later said it was probably not correct to call it "child pornography", which most people associate with images of real children, and that he should have said "depictions of child sexual abuse".<ref name=AFP/> [[Wikimedia Foundation]] spokesman Jay Walsh said Wikipedia doesn't have "material we would deem to be illegal. If we did, we would remove it."<ref name=AFP/> Following the complaint by Sanger, Jimmy Wales deleted many sexual images without consulting the community; some were reinstated following discussion.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/10104946.stm |title=Wikimedia pornography row deepens as Wales cedes rights|work=BBC News|date=May 19, 2010|accessdate=May 19, 2010}}</ref> Critics, including [[Wikipediocracy]], noticed that many of the sexual images deleted from Wikipedia since 2010 have reappeared.<ref name="XBIZ">{{cite web|url=http://newswire.xbiz.com/view.php?id=169017|publisher=[[XBIZ]]|date=September 17, 2013|first=Lila|last=Gray|title=Wikipedia Gives Porn a Break|accessdate=October 20, 2013}}</ref>-->
== কার্যক্রম ==
| |||