উইকিপিডিয়া:নির্ভরযোগ্য উৎস: সংশোধিত সংস্করণের মধ্যে পার্থক্য

বিষয়বস্তু বিয়োগ হয়েছে বিষয়বস্তু যোগ হয়েছে
Rafiqulislam Palash-এর সম্পাদিত সংস্করণ হতে Jayantanth-এর সম্পাদিত সর্বশেষ সংস্করণে ফেরত
ট্যাগ: পুনর্বহাল মোবাইল সম্পাদনা মোবাইল ওয়েব সম্পাদনা
Shakhawat70 (আলোচনা | অবদান)
১৪৪ নং লাইন:
Any analysis or interpretation of the quoted material, however, should rely on a secondary source (See: [[WP:No original research]]).
 
dakhil examinitation 2013
===Academic consensus===
{{Shortcut|WP:RS/AC}}
A statement that all or most scientists or scholars hold a certain view requires reliable sourcing that directly says that all or most scientists or scholars hold that view. Otherwise, individual opinions should be identified as those of particular, named sources. Editors should avoid original research especially with regard to making blanket statements based on [[WP:SYNTH|novel syntheses of disparate material]]. Stated simply, any statement in Wikipedia that academic consensus exists on a topic must be sourced rather than being based on the opinion or assessment of editors. [[Review article]]s, especially those printed in academic review journals that survey the literature, can help clarify academic consensus.
 
===Usage by other sources===