উইকিপিডিয়া:নিরপেক্ষ দৃষ্টিভঙ্গি: সংশোধিত সংস্করণের মধ্যে পার্থক্য

বিষয়বস্তু বিয়োগ হয়েছে বিষয়বস্তু যোগ হয়েছে
সম্পাদনা সারাংশ নেই
Jahanggir Jaman (আলোচনা | অবদান)
১০৪ নং লাইন:
A common argument in a dispute about reliable sources is that one source is biased and so another source should be given preference. The bias in sources argument is one way to present a POV as neutral by excluding sources that dispute the POV as biased. Biased sources are not inherently disallowed based on bias alone, although other aspects of the source may make it invalid. Neutral point of view should be achieved by balancing the bias in sources based on the weight of the opinion in reliable sources and not by excluding sources that do not conform to the editor's point of view. This does not mean any biased source ''must'' be used; it may well serve an article better [[WP:ONUS|to exclude the material altogether]].
 
==নিরপেক্ষতার বিরোধিতা মোকাবেলা==
==Handling neutrality disputes==
===পক্ষপাতমূলক বিবৃতি প্রদান===
===Attributing and specifying biased statements===
{{Policy shortcut|WP:SUBSTANTIATE|WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV}}
{{See also|Wikipedia:Citing sources#In-text attribution}}
১১৪ নং লাইন:
Avoid the temptation to rephrase biased or opinion statements with [[WP:WEASEL|weasel words]], for example, "Many people think John Doe is the best baseball player." But "Who?" and "How many?" are natural objections. An exception is a situation where a phrase such as "Most people think" can be supported by a reliable source, such as in the reporting of a survey of opinions within the group.
 
===দৃষ্টিকোণ তুলেধরা | Point-of-view forks ===
{{Policy shortcut|WP:NPOVFACT|WP:NPOVVIEW}}{{Anchor|Point of view forks|reason=Old name of section.}}
:''See the [[Wikipedia:Content forking|content-fork]] guideline for clarification on the issues raised in this section.''
১২১ নং লাইন:
All facts and significant points of view on a given subject should be treated in one article except in the case of a [[Wikipedia:Content forking#Article spinoffs: "Summary style" articles|spinoff sub-article]]. Some topics are so large that one article cannot reasonably cover all facets of the topic, so a spinoff sub-article is created. For example, [[Evolution as fact and theory]] is a sub-article of [[Evolution]], and [[Creation-evolution controversy]] is a sub-article of [[Creationism]]. This type of split is permissible only if written from a neutral point of view and must not be an attempt to evade the consensus process at another article.
 
===প্রয়োজনীয় ধারণা তৈরি করা===
===Making necessary assumptions===
{{Policy shortcut|WP:MNA}}
When writing articles, there may be cases where making some assumptions is necessary to get through a topic. For example, in writing about evolution, it is not helpful to hash out the creation-evolution controversy on every page. There are virtually no topics that could proceed without making some assumptions that ''someone'' would find controversial. This is true not only in evolutionary biology, but also in philosophy, history, physics, etc.