উইকিপিডিয়া:অপসারণ পদ্ধতি: সংশোধিত সংস্করণের মধ্যে পার্থক্য
বিষয়বস্তু বিয়োগ হয়েছে বিষয়বস্তু যোগ হয়েছে
অ →সমাপ্তি আলোচনা: +কোরাম নয় |
অ প্রারম্ভিক অবসান |
||
১০৭ নং লাইন:
===প্রারম্ভিক অবসান===
===Early closure===
In general, deletion discussions should remain open for at least seven days (168 hours) to allow interested editors adequate time to participate. However, under certain circumstances, discussions may be closed prior to the seven-day timeframe.
Closers should apply good judgment before speedily closing a discussion, since often it is best to allow the discussion to continue for the entirety of the seven-day period.
{| class=wikitable
;Withdrawn nomination{{Anchor|Withdrawn nomination}}{{Shortcut|WP:WITHDRAWN}}▼
|-
The nominator may withdraw the nomination at any time. However, if subsequent editors have added substantive comments in good faith, the discussion should not be speedily closed. A nomination should not be withdrawn in order to try to short-circuit an ongoing discussion.▼
▲
▲
* Early closure is inappropriate where it appears that the withdrawal is simply an attempt to short-circuit an ongoing discussion.
* If the nominator appears to have genuinely changed their mind due to other views expressed, the discussion should not be considered withdrawn. Instead, consider whether to use any of the early closures below.
|-
| '''[[Wikipedia:Speedy keep|Speedy keep]]<span id="Speedy keep" />''' || A "speedy keep" outcome is appropriate when the nomination unquestionably is an attempt to vandalize or to otherwise create disruption. For example:
* Nominations which are clearly an attempt to end an editing dispute through deletion (possibly in an attempt to [[WP:GAME|game the system]]), when [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]] would be a more appropriate course.
* Nominations which are made solely to provide a forum for disruption (this includes [[WP:HARRASS|editor harassment]]).
১২৪ ⟶ ১২৬ নং লাইন:
* Nominations which are so erroneous that they indicate that the nominator has not even read the article in question.
* The nominator is [[Wikipedia:Banning policy|banned]], so their edits are not to be retained. In that case, the ''nominated page'' is speedily kept while the ''nomination'' can be tagged with {{tl|db-g5}} and speedily deleted as a banned contribution. However, if subsequent editors have added substantive comments in good faith, the nomination should not be speedily closed (though the nominator's opinion will be discounted in the closure decision).
|-
When the nominated page unambiguously falls
|-
| '''[[Wikipedia:Snowball clause|Snowball clause]]<span id="Snowball clause" /><span id="SNOW" />''' || The "snowball clause" exists to avoid [[WP:NOT#BUREAUCRACY|process for the sake of process]], or when the outcome of the deletion discussion is, or has become, [[almost certain]], such that there is not a "snowball's chance in hell" that the outcome will be anything other than what is expected, and there is clearly no need at all to prolong discussion further.
This clause '''should not be used''' to close a discussion when a particular outcome is merely "likely" or "highly likely", and there is a genuine and reasoned basis for disagreement. This is because deletion discussions are [[WP:NOTAVOTE|not a vote]]; it is important to be reasonably sure that there is little or no chance of accidentally excluding significant input or perspectives, or changing the weight of different views, if closed early. Especially, closers should beware of interpreting "early pile on" as necessarily showing how a discussion will end up. This can sometimes happen when a topic attracts high levels of attention from those engaged (or having a specific view) but slower attention from other less involved editors, perhaps with other points of view. It can sometimes be better to allow a few extra days even if current discussion seems very clearly to hold one opinion, to be sure that it really will be a snowball and as a courtesy to be sure that no significant input will be excluded if closed very soon.
▲;Speedy delete{{Anchor|Speedy delete close}}{{Shortcut|WP:SPEEDYCLOSE}}
|}
▲When the nominated page unambiguously falls under at least one of the criteria for speedy deletion, particularly [[WP:CSD#G10|criterion G10]] (attack page) or [[WP:CSD#G12|criterion G12]] (copyright violation), it is not necessary to wait until the end of the discussion period.
===কোরাম নয়===
| |||