উইকিপিডিয়া:ভালো নিবন্ধের মানদণ্ড: সংশোধিত সংস্করণের মধ্যে পার্থক্য
বিষয়বস্তু বিয়োগ হয়েছে বিষয়বস্তু যোগ হয়েছে
অ বট: 1 টি আন্তঃউইকি সংযোগ স্থানান্তর করেছে, যা এখন উইকিউপাত্তের - d:q8978473 এ রয়েছে |
Jayantanth (আলোচনা | অবদান) fixed |
||
৫২ নং লাইন:
{{Reflist}}
[[বিষয়শ্রেণী:উইকিপ্রকল্প ভালো নিবন্ধ]]
--------------
<noinclude>{{Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Tab header}}
{{shortcut|WP:WIAGA|WP:GA?|WP:GANO?}}
<!--{{redirect|WP:GAC|"good article candidates"|Wikipedia:Good article nominations}}-->
A [[Wikipedia:Good articles|good article]] is a satisfactory article that has met the '''good article criteria''' but may not have met the [[Wikipedia:Featured article criteria|criteria]] for [[Wikipedia:Featured articles|featured articles]].<noinclude><ref>Good articles are only measured against the good article criteria; at the time of assessment, they may or may not meet featured article criteria.</ref></noinclude> <noinclude>The good article criteria measure ''decent'' articles; they are [[Wikipedia:Compare Criteria Good v. Featured|not as demanding]] as the featured article criteria, which determine our ''best'' articles.</noinclude>
<noinclude>
==Criteria==
An article can be failed without further review if, prior to the review, it has cleanup banners that are obviously still valid. These include {{tl|cleanup}}, {{tl|POV}}, {{tl|unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{tl|fact}}, {{tl|citation needed}}, {{tl|clarifyme}}, or similar tags. (See also {{tl|QF-tags}}). If the article is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria then it can be failed without being placed on hold. If copyright infringements are found in a nominated article then it can be failed without further review. In all other cases a full review against the six criteria is to be conducted and the nominator given a chance to address any issues.
{{Shortcut|WP:GACR}}
</noinclude>
A [[Wikipedia:Good articles|good article]] is—
<ol>
<li>{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}:</li>
<ol STYLE="list-style-type: lower-alpha">
<li>{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1a}}; and</li>
<li>{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1b}}.<noinclude><ref> Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|Manual of Style mainpage]] or subpages of the guides listed, is ''not'' required for good articles.</ref></noinclude></li>
</ol>
<li>{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}:</li>
<ol STYLE="list-style-type: lower-alpha">
<li>{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2a}};</li>
<li>{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2b}};<noinclude><ref>Either [[Parenthetical referencing|parenthetical references]] or [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (footnotes)|footnotes]] can be used for in-line citations, but not both in the same article. Dead links are considered verifiable only if the link is not a bare url.</ref></noinclude> and</li>
<li>{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2c}}.</li>
</ol>
<li>{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}:</li>
<ol STYLE="list-style-type: lower-alpha">
<li>{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3a}};<noinclude><ref>This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of [[Wikipedia:Featured articles|featured articles]]; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.</ref></noinclude> and</li>
<li>{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3b}}.</li>
</ol>
<li>{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|4}}.</li>
<li>{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|5}}.</li><noinclude><ref>Vandalism reversions, ''proposals'' to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as [[copy editing]]), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of constructive editing should be placed on hold.</ref></noinclude>
<li>{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}:</li><noinclude><ref>Other media, such as video and [[Wikipedia:Music samples|sound clips]], are also covered by this criterion.</ref></noinclude>
<ol STYLE="list-style-type: lower-alpha">
<li>{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6a}}; and</li>
<li>{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6b}}.<noinclude><ref>The presence of images is ''not'', in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status ''are'' appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.</ref></noinclude></li>
</ol>
</ol><noinclude>
==What cannot be a good article?==
* '''[[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Stand-alone lists|Stand-alone lists]], portals, sounds, and images''': these items should be nominated for [[Wikipedia:Featured lists|featured list]], [[Wikipedia:Featured portals|featured portal]], [[Wikipedia:Featured sounds|featured sounds]], and [[Wikipedia:Featured pictures|featured picture]] status, respectively.
* '''[[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages|Disambiguation pages]] and [[Wikipedia:Stub|stubs]]''': these pages cannot meet the criteria.
* '''[[Wikipedia:Featured articles|Featured articles]]''': a good article loses its status when promoted to a featured article. Accordingly, demoted featured articles are not automatically graded as good articles and must be reassessed for quality.
==See also==
* [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions]] – step by step instructions on how to handle the GA process
* [[Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles]] – editing guidelines for reviewing an article for GA status.
* [[Wikipedia:What the Good article criteria are not]] – an essay which emphasizes that good article reviews should be concluded ''only'' in accordance with the good article criteria, not personal preferences.
* [[Wikipedia:Featured article criteria]]
==Notes==
{{Reflist|2}}
[[Category:WikiProject Good articles|{{PAGENAME}}]]
[[ar:ويكيبيديا:معايير المقالة الجيدة]]
[[bn:উইকিপিডিয়া:ভাল নিবন্ধের গুণাবলী]]
[[id:Wikipedia:Kriteria artikel bagus]]
[[zh:Wikipedia:甚麼是優良條目]]
</noinclude>
| |||