উইকিপিডিয়া:সংঘাত নিরসন: সংশোধিত সংস্করণের মধ্যে পার্থক্য

সংঘাত নিরসনের এই পর্যায়ে বা অন্য যে কোন পর্যায়ে অন্যপক্ষের সাথে আলোচনা করা, কেবল সংঘাত নিরসনের পরবর্তী পর্যায়ে যাওয়ার জন্য মুখরক্ষার ব্যাপার নয়। আলোচনায় সদিচ্ছার অভাব দেখালে এটাই প্রমাণিত হয় যে আপনি নিরসনের বদলে সংঘাতটিকে আরও উসকে দিতে চাচ্ছেন। এ ধরণের আচরণের ফলে আপনি লোকজনের সহানুভূতি হারাতে পারেন, আর এতে সংঘাত নিরসনের পরবর্তী পর্যায়গুলোতে আপনার অংশগ্রহণে সীমাবদ্ধ হওয়ার সুযোগ আছে। অন্য দিকে আপনি যদি অন্য পক্ষের সাথে আন্তরিকভাবে ঐক্যমতে আসার জন্য নিরবচ্ছিন্ন আলোচনা চালিয়ে যান, এবং সেটা যদি শুরুতে সংঘাত নিরসনে সফল নাও হয়, তবে আপনি যে উইকিপিডিয়ার নীতিমালা অনুসারে সমাধান খুঁজতে আগ্রহী তা প্রকাশ পায়।

 

{{see|Wikipedia:Requesting dispute resolution}}

 

===Sensitive and privacy-related issues===

Ultimately, all English Wikipedia-based actions are open to the scrutiny of the Arbitration Committee, as the final stage of dispute resolution on the English Wikipedia, and as the body ultimately responsible for non-public information and privacy related issues on the wiki.

 

[[Wikipedia:Editor assistance|Editor assistance]] helps editors find someone experienced to provide you one-on-one advice and feedback. While not a required part of dispute resolution, it is designed to help you understand how to clearly and civilly express your views and work toward consensus. You may request an assistant's help at any time, whether you're involved in dispute resolution or not. Assistants can also help you find the best way to resolve your dispute or issue.

 

If you need neutral outside opinions in a dispute involving '''only two''' editors, turn to [[Wikipedia:Third opinion]].

 

Ask at a subject-specific [[Wikipedia:WikiProject]] talk page. Usually, such projects are listed on top of the article talk page.

 

Ask at a [[Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines|policy talk page]] relevant to the issue.

 

Turn to [[Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts]] for problems with [[WP:CIVIL|uncivil]] editors. First, however, consider [[WP:Ignore personal attacks|ignoring it]] – you can often get much more accomplished by rising above uncivil comments, and staying focussed on the task at hand.

 

Turn to [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment]], the main avenue for disputes about user conduct. While Request for Comment can be used for disputes about User Conduct, you can also request comments on articles, templates, categories, policies and guidelines.

 

[[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation|Request formal mediation]] of the dispute from the [[Wikipedia:Mediation Committee|Mediation Committee]]. [[Wikipedia:Mediation|Mediation]] is a voluntary process in which a neutral person works with the parties to a dispute. The mediator helps guide the parties into reaching an agreement that can be acceptable to everyone. When requesting formal mediation, be prepared to show that you tried to resolve the dispute using the steps listed above, and that all parties to the dispute are in agreement to mediate. Mediation cannot take place if all parties are not willing to take part. Mediation is only for disputes about Article Content, not for complaints about user conduct.

 

If consensus is difficult to gauge from discussion alone, consider conducting a survey of opinion to clarify the issues in the discussion. Note that a survey cannot ''generate'' consensus, but is helpful for understanding it. Similarly, if you believe that users are ignoring a consensus, a survey cannot force those users to accept your proposed consensus – although a survey ''might'' assist users in understanding the balance of opinions and reasons for those opinions on a given dispute, it can also easily degenerate into an argument over whether a particular survey is fairly constructed or representative. See [[Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion]] for reasons why discussion is necessary and superior to voting.